InSoMnIaC20
Head Gardener
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2008
- Messages
- 464
I thought you were quitting after this round DaX :s
Member, UK, contactable, mobile web, highly active {hours per day varies}
No effort in organizing something that might not work in the first place doesn't help.
Need an overview message to advertise this, or a mass account mail.
There needs to be a better way of getting the idea out to the masses.
I thought you were quitting after this round DaX :s
Twigley speaks truth
I thought the point of the mash up was to have the leaders each pick a core of 10 or so players and then the remaining spots were to be filled through the sign up list. Perhaps Im old and senile and not understanding things
We're all up for suggestions of automated alliance, constant complaints about how the same people team up over and over....
How about:
Martin leads an alliance
Twigley leads an alliance
Silence leads an alliance
We all recruit 20 members who we would have in our alliance, as normal. However before round starts we share the 57 names of the other members and we 'scatter' them. We all then take it turns to select one person in our alliance until all 57 names are gone, and we each have 20 people in our alliances.
So when round starts we have the 3 competing alliances on fairly equal playing fields. I would trust anyone else leading in this position to have no spies and to play how it should be played etc.
I personally don't have time to lead so my name above is just an example, but would the top leaders e.g. Changer, Twigley, Silence, Toby etc. be willing to do it?