Dax
Hydroponics Developer
+1 for initiative.
round 43 - ANQ|FL|HC love triangle
- Thread starter willymchilybily
- Start date
+1 for initiative.
By everyone else you mean the two alliances who snapped each other? Or? If so i don't think i need to reply further to that.
@ Dax;
I asked for the spam to be taken out of my recruitment thread. Sorry if that upset you. Hugs.
Ignore this if you would like but i'm getting bored of the same line from the same repeat offenders;
I have no double standards at all. The line of arguement you're going down there is terrible. You're either trolling ... in which case 7/10 ... or you're just a sheep who has been spinning the same line for rounds and now actually beleive it.
If you think having 3 wings in round 30 was the turning point of the playerbase going down or was any worse than what the same people who are in HC and FL do almost every single round they play then you're pretty [86x]tunnelvisioned[/86x]. A new homepage was all that changed for bush in round 30 and the boring retheric about how it was a new age and all nice and fluffy was a joke. I'd already been 2/3/4 v 1'ed twice before round 30 when leading and the playerbase had died 4 rounds before that.
The real thing that [petergriffin]grinds my gears[/petergriffin] is that the people who QQ'ed so hard about round 30 (BUT HAD DONE IT ATLEAST TWICE BEFORE TO MY OWN ALLIANCES) and never let it go are the ones who have repeat offended the most. Both pre and post round 30. And even more so when it's been against the EULA. So cheating in effect. And it's happened again with exactly the same people. With the same awful excuse of round 30.
Im fairly sure it was you Dax who said you shouldn't judge a person on one round. Thankfully for me i can judge people on multiple rounds who repeat offend and justify it by talking about round 30.
IoF and Ahead did a really good job on spreading the tales to the sheep of the past and for that i need to get another trophy made up. It's amazing how you can get away with always 2/3/4 v 1ing alliances (even more so that it's against the EULA now) and still think it can justify it by being hypocritical.
In the end it did all turn out as all of the alliances proclaimed they wanted it to.
HC got rank 1 by whatever way necessary.
FL managed to stop any possibility of ANQ being rank 1 and protected HC so they can now rush the rank 1 alliance because it's easier to rush an alliance with high eta units.
ANQ have managed to get to the point in the round now they can do what they wanted to do and with the extra comedy value added by how it was achieved.
Round 40 took almost that. When TBA were declared on by rank 1 (who were led by FL and then HC members), beat their ass down with ease and then beat all the help that they got (WHAT A SURPRISE) down too.
Round 37 also took longer than this round when their leadership was from FL people snapped from day 2 to day 30 and didnt do a single bit of damage to each other and 2 v 1'ed other alliances. I would say that round was more interesting than this round too but had a similiar template with similiar members, just with an extra alliance so took a bit longer.
I'm also taking the trophy away from HC due to it not being accepted in a polite manner by DaX. Took me ages that too.
Chris_
Head Gardener
Notice how twigs doesn't defend leeds, cause he knows he's fighting a losing battle.
Dax
Hydroponics Developer
Er, yup - That was me. Means to an end/Boot on the other foot/Other relevant metaphor. IoF nor Ahead had no say in this round's decisions, though. IoF joined AFTER, as a member only.
I was in that 2v1'd alliance. Complaints were made, but we all just got bored and went inactive (as you have).
This has made me saddest of all. Shame upon ye.
You have wisdom? Why have you been holding out?
Dimitar
Landscape Designer
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,388
I have been, yes. Though I've still shared a fair bit. Here - http://bushtarion.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5590
Might make you significantly better at this game.
PS:
LuckySports
Landscape Designer
Must have played a different round 37.. I Remember fighting Aphallatosis more stringently than most wars since and was never napped with them. But of course, the truth wouldn't serve your purpose, so why state it?
Your memory is a bit skewed..
And the CORE of FL members might be the same 4/5 folks, but the majority of the members are different, which of course, also wouldn't serve your purpose. I think you need to re-purpose, it will make your arguments valid and sensible.
As far as im concerned, the CORE is what makes an alliance who it is.
+1, qft, etc etc. LS strayed into left field.
tobapopalos
Hydroponics Developer
Totally agreed.
IceOfFire
Garden Designer
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 932
Agreed 110%
