Luckysports: So mutual attacking isn't cheating now?
* Worst Player - CK for cheating / DaX for getting rank 1 being a gobby **** then getting pwned and shutting up pretty much completely.
I'd just like to say that this is fairly hypocritical since you asked me to trigger AR on your pnap only about a week ago. Pathetic.
Well toby I aint moaning about people triggering on others I find it quite entertaining to see some people do it on others.
What I am moaning about is mutual attacking which has been against the rules for a long time.
Even if I did ask you to send to my pnap that is not mutual attacking, sending at somebody so they can retal and trigger on you (without geos several times from both Luckysports and Lafin) is mutual attacking.
If you call somebody saying send to this id eta x mutual attacking then every single alliance attack is a mutual attack toby darling.
by the way ive seen all this talk of mutual attacking and mutual triggering. stop being so ****ing confusing you jibblets. if you attack some one mutually. its naughty considered cheating. if you send at some one to trigger thier AR. then you must have a mutual understaning or agreement that if they get incoming that cant be defended then you will attack them or some one will, to trigger AR, even if they dont tell you or you are doing it as a favour without being asked or asking some one to do it for you. You have a mutual understanding, and you are attacking them to benefit them by abusing a loop hole. its not a genuine attack for land kills or bribes, and its not troop trading, but it is a planned attack to help the person, not hurt them. and is equally as bad as giving the guy 1billion hippies to bribe or letting your rpg be last ticked by some puppets. intentionally sending at the target an attack with the prospective of helping them. Ergo it is a mutual attack (whether its to trigger or for bribes etc)
If you can consider one cheating then by the same logic the other must be the same. its not different. its all attacking mutually. its harder to prove, but its just as bad attacking some one to give them troops, and make them hard to kill, as attacking some one to trigger troops to appear and stop some one landing.
i dunno if its sarcasm or just plain stupidity. One is as bad as the other, even if you tell yourself it isnt because the admin is afk and the system is not perfect, even if you tell yourself its not clearly stipulated in the EULA, it is one and the same for all its intents and purposes. So please either say..i dont think its cheating its not my fault the system allows it and move on. or say its cheating i think its naughty, and not good sportsmanship. but dont argue theres some ****ing saintly line that sits on a knife edge that you alone can walk and every one else that does it is a ****ing cheat. stupid, sarcastic, hypocritical, trolling people i dont even know who im getting mad at, but sort it out.