I've noticed the little 3 way war mainly consists of running away no one seems to fight
No point in fighting impossible battles.
No point in fighting impossible battles.
thats not what the Romans said about Hannibal, and eventually Rome won
No point in fighting impossible battles.
thats not what the Romans said about Hannibal, and eventually Rome won
Yes, but the ratio of Romans:Carthaginians wasn't exactly a computer code...
And also, if they won it obviously wasn't impossible.
No point in fighting impossible battles.
thats not what the Romans said about Hannibal, and eventually Rome won
Yes, but the ratio of Romans:Carthaginians wasn't exactly a computer code...
And also, if they won it obviously wasn't impossible.
No point in fighting impossible battles.
thats not what the Romans said about Hannibal, and eventually Rome won
Yes, but the ratio of Romans:Carthaginians wasn't exactly a computer code...
And also, if they won it obviously wasn't impossible.
well it was impossible, i do believe that Hannibal was undefeated throughout the second punic war and remained undefeated for a couple decades after that. Rome only won the war by sending wave after wave of soldiers to their deaths until Hannibal had killed more men then Death could handle, so Death told him to GTFO.
No point in fighting impossible battles.
thats not what the Romans said about Hannibal, and eventually Rome won
Yes, but the ratio of Romans:Carthaginians wasn't exactly a computer code...
And also, if they won it obviously wasn't impossible.
well it was impossible, i do believe that Hannibal was undefeated throughout the second punic war and remained undefeated for a couple decades after that. Rome only won the war by sending wave after wave of soldiers to their deaths until Hannibal had killed more men then Death could handle, so Death told him to GTFO.
not entirely true actually. Hannibal may have won a series of battles, but he couldn't win the war.
The romans, led by Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus Cunctator after two disastrous roman defeats (last one being lake trasimene) employed delaying tactics, hence his nickname ****ator (meaning The Delayer).
This led to Hannibal being unable to exploit his two victories in the field, and made the war 'far from impossible'. It would have been very very difficult to beat Hannibal in the field, but the longer he spent roaming Italy, unable to conquer the Romans overall, he simply made his defeat all the more imminent.
Hannibal was in many respects a genius, but he, as Maharbal himself said, "knew how to win a victory, but not how to exploit it" That war was far from impossible.
Either way we have been far far derailed on this topic.
We have done just as much if not more running. No point in fighting impossible battles.
<FeR> lol Grandes Cojones rescinded again?
<FeR> this is so funny
<FeR> they go to bed, and rescind war
<FeR> they come back, and declare
<FeR> they should be called grandes "cagones/maricones/gays"
<FeR> or in english big pu***'s
<FeR>
<FeR> or just small balls
Everybody is so harsh. We just want peace and love for all people. No more war.
Or would you just feed off the solos?
Or would you just feed off the solos?
we will begin photosynthesis, and grow off the sunlight
Or would you just feed off the solos?
we will begin photosynthesis, and grow off the sunlight