Why would the "resistance" which consits of what 3/4 alliances? hit one particular alliance that isnt rank 1 or even rank 2 ? (not sure what rank they are/was when the "resistance" hit them) And why should the resistance fail just because ail wouldnt go on a mass bash of a smaller alliance?
Why would the "resistance" which consits of what 3/4 alliances? hit one particular alliance that isnt rank 1 or even rank 2 ? (not sure what rank they are/was when the "resistance" hit them) And why should the resistance fail just because ail wouldnt go on a mass bash of a smaller alliance?
Nah it wouldn't.
Btw my ally have been part of the resistance since before RRR became #1.
And for the record we did not participate in any mass-bash on OF either. (If you would call attacking an ally twice your size a bash).
Why would the "resistance" which consits of what 3/4 alliances? hit one particular alliance that isnt rank 1 or even rank 2 ? (not sure what rank they are/was when the "resistance" hit them) And why should the resistance fail just because ail wouldnt go on a mass bash of a smaller alliance?
Nah it wouldn't.
Btw my ally have been part of the resistance since before RRR became #1.
And for the record we did not participate in any mass-bash on OF either. (If you would call attacking an ally twice your size a bash).
Lies... in the waves on OF many of the ids were EF whether as part of the organised 'resistance' against rank 4 or just multiple ids looking for easy land
As for your alliance mails regarding a 'bash' look up the term please 4-5 members of one alliance hitting your alliance does not qualify, 110 incs from 5-6 allies (including yours) totally 4.3bil troops does.......
Please Enrico stop the lies and the nonsense there are those amongst our ranks that hate liars and like to land rape them......
Why would the "resistance" which consits of what 3/4 alliances? hit one particular alliance that isnt rank 1 or even rank 2 ? (not sure what rank they are/was when the "resistance" hit them) And why should the resistance fail just because ail wouldnt go on a mass bash of a smaller alliance?
Nah it wouldn't.
Btw my ally have been part of the resistance since before RRR became #1.
And for the record we did not participate in any mass-bash on OF either. (If you would call attacking an ally twice your size a bash).
Lies... in the waves on OF many of the ids were EF whether as part of the organised 'resistance' against rank 4 or just multiple ids looking for easy land
As for your alliance mails regarding a 'bash' look up the term please 4-5 members of one alliance hitting your alliance does not qualify, 110 incs from 5-6 allies (including yours) totally 4.3bil troops does.......
Please Enrico stop the lies and the nonsense there are those amongst our ranks that hate liars and like to land rape them......
The 'Resistance' can pr definition only attack #1.
As for whether EF members joined the attack on OF? Most likely. I had no full ID list of OF, and have never considered them a proper target anyway. (They ain't #1 and they ain't something we can take out on our own) But I sure as hell haven't safelisted them either.
And no, "bash" is perhaps a bit strong, but when 4 players, all twice the size of their target attack 4 times in a row, its kinda pathetic. Especially when they recall even when the BR would most likely have been a fun 50/50!!
I have full respect for OF but queening while bottom feeding don't really become them at all!
I can assure you those ids were in the first wave so thats a lie but its the word of OF against those of EF.
Second taking easy land from an alliance that is too fat on land and has virtually no troops to defend itself is not as you put it "pathetic scorequeening bottomfeeding" its called taking easy land from an enemy and happens every day in this game
learn to defend and stop whining like a little girl because OMFG an alliance bigger than you attacks alone and steals your land EPIC fail indeed ^^
There were also ids of EF in the first wave on Fail. You as well as I know that in large hits, vultures join in on the easy land. And let's call things like they are. A mate of mine in EF has been complaining about OF hitting with 4 (200%) over 2 ticks on 1 player days before this "resistance on OF". So lets not turn things around, you went for easy land before that "resistance", and you're still doing that.I can assure you those ids were in the first wave so thats a lie but its the word of OF against those of EF.
I think he was referring to you recalling at the slightest sight of trouble (ie not going in for battles, just for land). Everyone does it, but then again, almost everyone is a scorequeen bottomfeeder these days. Toby's targets almost always send out, he's still top 10 on bountyhunting. Because no one cares about battles anymore, just about easy land.Second taking easy land from an alliance that is too fat on land and has virtually no troops to defend itself is not as you put it "pathetic scorequeening bottomfeeding" its called taking easy land from an enemy and happens every day in this game
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I have not seen any ally not having a few players whining about unfair inc. I plead guilty about it myself, I'm probably the biggest whiner in Aili. But that's because I do think that if you're being bashed by a far superior force, you have the right to whine. And anyway, your ally has whined about the "resistance" too, so I think it's only fair you accept that Enrico isn't too happy with the inc you've been giving him.learn to defend and stop whining like a little girl because OMFG an alliance bigger than you attacks alone and steals your land EPIC fail indeed ^^
There were also ids of EF in the first wave on Fail. You as well as I know that in large hits, vultures join in on the easy land. And let's call things like they are. A mate of mine in EF has been complaining about OF hitting with 4 (200%) over 2 ticks on 1 player days before this "resistance on OF". So lets not turn things around, you went for easy land before that "resistance", and you're still doing that.I can assure you those ids were in the first wave so thats a lie but its the word of OF against those of EF.
Yes your right Hobbezak everyone attacks so that its easy to get killed/blocked ^^. No seriously if your alliance cant defend against 4 200% attackers you are not a good alliance that is only the equivalent of 8 defenders (6 or 7 at most if you include those attacked)
I think he was referring to you recalling at the slightest sight of trouble (ie not going in for battles, just for land). Everyone does it, but then again, almost everyone is a scorequeen bottomfeeder these days. Toby's targets almost always send out, he's still top 10 on bountyhunting. Because no one cares about battles anymore, just about easy land.Second taking easy land from an alliance that is too fat on land and has virtually no troops to defend itself is not as you put it "pathetic scorequeening bottomfeeding" its called taking easy land from an enemy and happens every day in this game
No since this game first started (like yourself i was there) there is and never had been a point in losing troops if you can go back later and get better odds... (well there is one reason but nobody here needs to lose score to get better targets) not dying is a vital part of this game ^^
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I have not seen any ally not having a few players whining about unfair inc. I plead guilty about it myself, I'm probably the biggest whiner in Aili. But that's because I do think that if you're being bashed by a far superior force, you have the right to whine. And anyway, your ally has whined about the "resistance" too, so I think it's only fair you accept that Enrico isn't too happy with the inc you've been giving him.learn to defend and stop whining like a little girl because OMFG an alliance bigger than you attacks alone and steals your land EPIC fail indeed ^^
There were also ids of EF in the first wave on Fail. You as well as I know that in large hits, vultures join in on the easy land. And let's call things like they are. A mate of mine in EF has been complaining about OF hitting with 4 (200%) over 2 ticks on 1 player days before this "resistance on OF". So lets not turn things around, you went for easy land before that "resistance", and you're still doing that.I can assure you those ids were in the first wave so thats a lie but its the word of OF against those of EF.
Yes your right Hobbezak everyone attacks so that its easy to get killed/blocked ^^. No seriously if your alliance cant defend against 4 200% attackers you are not a good alliance that is only the equivalent of 8 defenders (6 or 7 at most if you include those attacked)
I think he was referring to you recalling at the slightest sight of trouble (ie not going in for battles, just for land). Everyone does it, but then again, almost everyone is a scorequeen bottomfeeder these days. Toby's targets almost always send out, he's still top 10 on bountyhunting. Because no one cares about battles anymore, just about easy land.Second taking easy land from an alliance that is too fat on land and has virtually no troops to defend itself is not as you put it "pathetic scorequeening bottomfeeding" its called taking easy land from an enemy and happens every day in this game
No since this game first started (like yourself i was there) there is and never had been a point in losing troops if you can go back later and get better odds... (well there is one reason but nobody here needs to lose score to get better targets) not dying is a vital part of this game ^^
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I have not seen any ally not having a few players whining about unfair inc. I plead guilty about it myself, I'm probably the biggest whiner in Aili. But that's because I do think that if you're being bashed by a far superior force, you have the right to whine. And anyway, your ally has whined about the "resistance" too, so I think it's only fair you accept that Enrico isn't too happy with the inc you've been giving him.learn to defend and stop whining like a little girl because OMFG an alliance bigger than you attacks alone and steals your land EPIC fail indeed ^^
He can be as unhappy as he likes but this discussion started because of basic lies by Enrico that i corrected. Im sure even you can see the difference between the incoming i whined about and an alliance complaing of 4 attackers
I have been out the game for a while so i dont know your relationship to Enrico but hes doing badly enough without any help......
How about I promise you results? If the remaining card holders don't attack to resist (however, I believe that the ground will tremble soon!)... we're going to suicide every last man on RRR.
I don't blame you for not making it work. I said somewhere either in PM or elsewhere in this thread that it's an issue that rests on everyone's shoulders that are involved.
So feel free to pay us back on the way down when we fall. Besides, I'm not even nearly giving your alliance the level of inc we received from your alliance early on in the round. Just this time, there are lethals in play. This isn't payback though. EF was way too small; JJ and Twigley in much better position to compliment my efforts; I've been killing TIR all week; OF was being massed; thus the scale and process of elimination are your foes here.
You only had inc for one day.
How about I promise you results? If the remaining card holders don't attack to resist (however, I believe that the ground will tremble soon!)... we're going to suicide every last man on RRR.
I don't blame you for not making it work. I said somewhere either in PM or elsewhere in this thread that it's an issue that rests on everyone's shoulders that are involved.
So feel free to pay us back on the way down when we fall. Besides, I'm not even nearly giving your alliance the level of inc we received from your alliance early on in the round. Just this time, there are lethals in play. This isn't payback though. EF was way too small; JJ and Twigley in much better position to compliment my efforts; I've been killing TIR all week; OF was being massed; thus the scale and process of elimination are your foes here.
I have no real stake in this in anyway, but, out of curiosity what is the timeline now in regards to your promise for results? 24 hours since hitting Fail? 48? 72 hours? At what point do you stop waiting and, with or without the resistance, hit RRR? Im not asking for an exact LT, but, a general timeframe of how long you are giving the resistance to actually resist?
You only had inc for one day.
Get Your Facts Straight. As far as I can recall, more than one wave was sent at us, I was woken up more than once during the week
P.S. Talking bout Enrico's guys - sorry m8 I'm a vulture, I needs easy land.
I have no real stake in this in anyway, but, out of curiosity what is the timeline now in regards to your promise for results? 24 hours since hitting Fail? 48? 72 hours? At what point do you stop waiting and, with or without the resistance, hit RRR? Im not asking for an exact LT, but, a general timeframe of how long you are giving the resistance to actually resist?