Mob slots

[alwaysnumb]

To help slow down mass attacking much smaller allies the way mob slots could be changed slightly.
Still have 5 total slots but if you send an att+1 it takes 2 slots and if you send att+2 it uses up 3 slots.

 

[Alcibiades]

I have to admit I'm rather intrigued by this idea so far. It has potential.

I don't think it would limit mass attacking much, but would definitely have an impact on bashing of lower ranked players.

 

[Dax]

I have to admit I'm rather intrigued by this idea so far. It has potential.

I don't think it would limit mass attacking much, but would definitely have an impact on bashing of lower ranked players.

QFT.

I concur.

 

[pinpower]

Agree with Alci and Dax.

I like it alot.

 

[TehPantz]

I think this is a winning idea.

 

[Stegosaurus]

i too approve

 

[Nitrous]

Definetly a good idea. Wow, such a simple idea. Has this ever been suggested before?

Thumbs up!

 

[Davs]

I like, and I'm surprised that I've never seen this suggestion before.

Go go gadget thumbs up.

 

[Twigley]

Oooohhhh!
That is one hell of an awesome idea.

 

[webvictim]

Fantastic idea, great thinking.

 

[tobapopalos]

Good stuff. Exactly the kind of thinking we need.

 

[Ogluk]

possibly the most innovative and intelligent suggestion i've seen on these forums in many a year

surprising it hasnt been thought of before, because it just makes sense

kudos, and has my support!

 

[Ryu]

I think it's dumb.

When you're zeroed and low on land, you pick targets.. let's say at 30% and flak them. I'd only be able to send 2 mobs?

 

[timthetyrant]

no, you would get 1.66666667 mobs to send, and i reckon its a good idea

 

[Alcibiades]

I think it's dumb.

When you're zeroed and low on land, you pick targets.. let's say at 30% and flak them. I'd only be able to send 2 mobs?

If you're zeroed, 40% is easily flakkable especially with WK change.

 

[willymchilybily]

I think it's dumb.

When you're zeroed and low on land, you pick targets.. let's say at 30% and flak them. I'd only be able to send 2 mobs?

If you're zeroed, 40% is easily flakkable especially with WK change.

This is right, 40% is ultimately best no matter what the circumstances


anyway good suggestion. another thumbs up here

 

[Dax]

I think it's dumb.

When you're zeroed and low on land, you pick targets.. let's say at 30% and flak them. I'd only be able to send 2 mobs?

If you are genuinely unable to rebuild yourself when you get zeroed without bashing the mod, then you shouldn't be playing top tier alliance-play. It's a basic requirement of an experienced player to be able to rebuild themselves when they will eventually die in some way.

 

[Hobbezak]

I think it's dumb.

When you're zeroed and low on land, you pick targets.. let's say at 30% and flak them. I'd only be able to send 2 mobs?

If you are genuinely unable to rebuild yourself when you get zeroed without bashing the mod, then you shouldn't be playing top tier alliance-play. It's a basic requirement of an experienced player to be able to rebuild themselves when they will eventually die in some way.

He does have a point.
Many people attack bots at 30% during flakwars. What about that?

 

[Dax]

BOOOOOO to ETA bashing, is my point.
I don't think it needs to be done, that's all. Another point of the debate is, 5 targets at 40% beats 2 targets at 30%. Why exchange? It's simple enough to do if you understand the game enough.

 

[Twigley]

I think it's dumb.

When you're zeroed and low on land, you pick targets.. let's say at 30% and flak them. I'd only be able to send 2 mobs?

If you are genuinely unable to rebuild yourself when you get zeroed without bashing the mod, then you shouldn't be playing top tier alliance-play. It's a basic requirement of an experienced player to be able to rebuild themselves when they will eventually die in some way.

He does have a point.
Many people attack bots at 30% during flakwars. What about that?

Wouldnt be hard to not apply the rule to bots.