NOTE: I've skimmed read the 1st post - didnt even bother reading any of the other responses - just seemed a waste of time (in a way, my post will be a waste of time cause i can imagine many people saying simliar things).
When I skimmed through the 1st post my eye caught 10 alliances (and their statistics) vs rank 1 in a resistance.
I'd say this is a piss poor attempt to save your alliance from being hit from bigger alliances.
How unrealistic do you want to be? Organising a resistance consisting of the top 10 alliances...right...gl with that.
Nitrous, If you had actually read the post, you would have seen that in fact 3-5 allies would be enough... and I have been part of resistances counting 7 alliances + solo groups.
The numbers was just to show that even with the current lead, RRR is no where near having a complete control of the field.
My bad, ill be sure to read it thoroughly next time. But I think you're figures are wrong anyway.
PS - What round did this resistance you speak of happen in and against who?