Bounty

[Mateeen]

it completely sucks

2 pefect attacks at 80% range with 4 dif types of troops with geos do 100 bil damage each and only get 1 bil bounty

it sucks.
more guidelines for bounty me thinks

 

[tobapopalos]

Died: 4,116,406 [£14,610,261,200] friendlies dead. 5,424,117 [£104,168,178,000] enemies dead.
You earned £15,563,444,740 bounty.

I suggest you just get better at bounty hunting.

 

[Matt]

doesnt bounty depend on what type of units you kill? not soley on the value u kill.

so if u slaughter 100bill worth of INN's is no where near reward ful as kill 100bill worth of LET's

 

[alexx]

Battle Report - xxxxxxxxxxxx[xxxx]
[range] 1,000,000 allied Psychopathic Android attacked, killing 821,467 hostile staff.
[range] 1,016,116 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 6,893,594 hostile staff.
[range] 329,559 hostile Grenadier attacked, killing 1,217,523 allied staff.
[range] 803,784 hostile Heavy Weapons attacked, killing 2,925,295 allied staff.
[range] 809,494 hostile Officer attacked, killing 1,297,636 allied staff.

Died: 5,440,454 [£25,327,723,000] friendlies dead. 7,715,061 [£67,391,812,600] enemies dead.

You lost 1,029 effectiveness.
You earned £994,184,412 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £4,825,926,000 insurance.


he was 76% of me. Oo why so little bounty

 

[MattM]

Could be many reasons- perhaps there were people in front of you or on the same tick with other troops (even if it's just flak), this will always significantly reduce bounty. If the person got defence and you killed those troops, then you don't get any bounty from those. Also as Matt said, if it was mostly innocents/NLT etc. that you killed you get significantly reduced bounty.

Edit: Also, if you didn't send Geos/Wheelies then you don't get full bounty either.

 

[alexx]

Battle Report - xxxxxxxxxxxx[xxxx]
[range] 1,000,000 allied Psychopathic Android attacked, killing 821,467 hostile staff.
[range] 1,016,116 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 6,893,594 hostile staff.
[range] 329,559 hostile Grenadier attacked, killing 1,217,523 allied staff.
[range] 803,784 hostile Heavy Weapons attacked, killing 2,925,295 allied staff.
[range] 809,494 hostile Officer attacked, killing 1,297,636 allied staff.

Died: 5,440,454 [£25,327,723,000] friendlies dead. 7,715,061 [£67,391,812,600] enemies dead.

You lost 1,029 effectiveness.
You earned £994,184,412 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £4,825,926,000 insurance.


he was 76% of me. Oo why so little bounty

was 1v1 vs a solo.

 

[Matt]

Battle Report - xxxxxxxxxxxx[xxxx]
[range] 1,000,000 allied Psychopathic Android attacked, killing 821,467 hostile staff.
[range] 1,016,116 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 6,893,594 hostile staff.
[range] 329,559 hostile Grenadier attacked, killing 1,217,523 allied staff.
[range] 803,784 hostile Heavy Weapons attacked, killing 2,925,295 allied staff.
[range] 809,494 hostile Officer attacked, killing 1,297,636 allied staff.

Died: 5,440,454 [£25,327,723,000] friendlies dead. 7,715,061 [£67,391,812,600] enemies dead.

You lost 1,029 effectiveness.
You earned £994,184,412 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £4,825,926,000 insurance.


he was 76% of me. Oo why so little bounty

was 1v1 vs a solo.

I notice you have negitive effectiveness, are you sure everything u are stating is true, as a hit on a 76% solo 1 vs 1 woulndt prooduce that. have u been constantly hitting him?

 

[pinpower]

Yeah iirc alot of things affect the level of bounty you'll get...type of troops sent (i.e pure LET etc), other attackers before/after you, repeat attacks, what you kill (INN/NLD net alot less bounty than pure LET, if you kill defenders you dont get bounty on them

Are you sure it you didnt send on them before and forgot? Or was there defenders there?

 

[alexx]

Battle Report - xxxxxxxxxxxx[xxxx]
[range] 1,000,000 allied Psychopathic Android attacked, killing 821,467 hostile staff.
[range] 1,016,116 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 6,893,594 hostile staff.
[range] 329,559 hostile Grenadier attacked, killing 1,217,523 allied staff.
[range] 803,784 hostile Heavy Weapons attacked, killing 2,925,295 allied staff.
[range] 809,494 hostile Officer attacked, killing 1,297,636 allied staff.

Died: 5,440,454 [£25,327,723,000] friendlies dead. 7,715,061 [£67,391,812,600] enemies dead.

You lost 1,029 effectiveness.
You earned £994,184,412 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £4,825,926,000 insurance.


he was 76% of me. Oo why so little bounty

was 1v1 vs a solo.

I notice you have negitive effectiveness, are you sure everything u are stating is true, as a hit on a 76% solo 1 vs 1 woulndt prooduce that. have u been constantly hitting him?

Battle Report - Attacking xxxx
[middle] 876,602 allied Psychopathic Android attacked, killing 670,667 hostile staff.
[middle] 950,016 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 4,244,670 hostile staff.
[middle] 167,584 hostile Grenadier attacked, killing 519,099 allied staff.
[middle] 561,318 hostile Heavy Weapons attacked, killing 1,842,161 allied staff.
[middle] 165,025 hostile Officer attacked, killing 267,542 allied staff.

Died: 2,628,802 [£11,986,694,600] friendlies dead. 4,915,337 [£55,190,397,900] enemies dead.

You gained 4,850 effectiveness.
You earned £854,836,344 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £2,240,203,000 insurance.

That was next tick, and yeah he was solo and i attacked him alone. But yeah ive attacked him before but that was like a week ago during flakwars

 

[Steve_God]

Battle Report - Attacking an ID [XXX] [f][range] 1,000,000 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 7,396,849 hostile staff.
[range] 789,865 hostile Petrol Bomber lobbed Molotov Cocktails and killed 3,659,370 allied staff.

Died: 3,659,370 [£11,876,805,000] friendlies dead.[/h] [f]7,396,849 [£52,381,824,500] enemies dead.

You gained 75,235 effectiveness.
You earned £10,026,787,949 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £1,683,899,140 insurance.

That's how to do it

 

[Silence]

Battle Report -


Died: 1,037,676 [£8,417,233,000] friendlies dead. 40,839,117 [£537,408,155,400] enemies dead.

You gained 224,499 effectiveness.
You earned £13,604,555,128 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £2,192,982,750 insurance.


Sent at 30% Bounty pwns =P

 

[timtadams]

Battle Report -


Died: 1,037,676 [£8,417,233,000] friendlies dead. 40,839,117 [£537,408,155,400] enemies dead.

You gained 224,499 effectiveness.
You earned £13,604,555,128 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £2,192,982,750 insurance.


Sent at 30% Bounty pwns =P

I consider this a problem

 

[pinpower]

why?
That's like 2% bounty...seems about right to me...?

 

[Alcibiades]

my only correction would be that you should get insurance when defending (only) and bounty when attacking (only). Not a combination of both.

 

[Garrett]

my only correction would be that you should get insurance when defending (only) and bounty when attacking (only). Not a combination of both.

j00 must spread around some rep before you can plug the alci again...


so I can only say that I agree.

 

[timtadams]

why?
That's like 2% bounty...seems about right to me...?

the fact you can profit by bounty alone when attacking at 30%. But then again, i guess its not alot....

However, when you consider that BR, it does seem a little unfair to me...

[edit]i guess i should mention i wasnt implying that there is a bug or something, i was just saying it was unfair

 

[pinpower]

No, i know you didnt mean a bug. And i can see where your coming from, but i think 2% isnt unfair. Its just cos he did a crazy amount of damage without taking any losses (basically) that he can make a profit.

I know you can make a profit attacking very low (as i believe f0xx showed last round) but its harder to do successfully for most people.
I wouldnt be against having no bounty when attacking at 30%, but i dont think 2% could be considered unfair.