@Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

Alcibiades

Plant Geneticist
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
4,267
Location
Canada
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

BlackWolf said:
Alci why so afraid and eager to drop this convo?

Because it's destructive to the playerbase and to morale of the players. I have nothing to be afraid of, but I don't think posting about this in public will get anywhere, not as it's a personal gripe. I'm happy to have the rules of IRC revised, I think they need it, or at least to be looked at, and get input from Players/OPs as to what should be done. I've posted that a few times, maybe you just missed it but it's there.

I feel my conduct is perfectly fine. I pasted that link above so that a constructive thread could be used to further the rethink of IRC rules. This thread is a gripe against myself with a vague irritation at the vagueness of the rules; the other thread is a clear cut recommendation to improve the rules.

Why are you so eager to make this your newest personal crusade?
 

No-Dachi

Official Helper
Joined
Dec 15, 2007
Messages
975
Location
Oslo, Norway
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

I feel that the problem here lies more in the way you reacted when he responded to the kick, than actually kicking. I sincerely believe that in this case it should be enough with a warning, and I also propose that in the Bushtarion OPs Handbook is added a paragraph about reading the context before taking action. I vaguely remember Bobbin kicking someone for stating a four digit number in response to a question that had nothing to do with bush whatsoever. In both cases the kicking could have been avoided had the OP taken the time to read the context.

As BlackWolf, I too feel offended if kicked without a reason. I don't know by, but I deem it rude, and therefore I take offense when kicked randomly. I feel that warnings should be issued at a more frequent rate, and especially in joke-like cases like this one.

But as I said, had this been the case of a kick, and either an apology, or an humble explanation of not really paying attention, and guiding him to the rules I do not think this would have blown up like it has (though I do not agree that it is out of proportion). I personally think that if the response would not have been as arrogant, nor had used 5.2 as a fallback, basically stating that "whatever you say you're wrong, because I can kick you at will no matter what", the player in question would have accepted it and moved on.


As stated, I feel that this situation could've been handled better; particularly the response. However, this is more about how OPs handle situations, than you as an OP; using this particularly situation as an example.


And way to go to make it sound like it's a bad thing to care, TheNameless.
 

Alcibiades

Plant Geneticist
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
4,267
Location
Canada
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

He asked for the rule which allowed me to kick him for requesting an ID. As there isn't one, as we have all stated, I used the only one (legally) available to me from the IRC rules. In this particular instance, since there was no relevant rule; I used the only one I could.

Alcibiades said:
Now as the best and brightest will notice, this does not in fact prohibit you from asking for IDs. As i've also stated above, everyone knows that you cannot do this. WildDisease, with your 21 rounds of knowledge, surely you would know this. I only used the (infamous) 7.1 Rule, because there is no rule that prevents people from asking for IDs. If there was a rule preventing people from asking for IDs, I would have used that rule. Would you be complaining in that circumstance?

I could have been clearer in explaining that to be sure; but it's pretty self evident. Next time when I 'punish' someone I will explain to them fully and completely their faulty behaviour, why I kicked them, what they are being punished for and direct them to the relevant rule.

Is that acceptable?
 

BlackWolf

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,217
Location
Lappeenranta, Finland (Wolf territory)
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

Alci relax please! You are taking this all way too personally.
Yes WD made this thread about you, but since then not me or not Dachi have meant it personally. We see things in another picture. We think of "what we would feel if this would have happend to us" in comparison to "What if we would be in alcis shoes".

We agree that WD made a mistake, and we think that you acted pretty harshly.
But that is not our point.

We dont inspect things as individuals but of what happend and what has and could happen in future. So we try to think ways to improve how things could work. I pologiese now to you if you felt offended by my posts, I personally think that you followed the rules and you did exactly what rules told you to do. I just dont think that is what I would have done or what I think was the right thing to do.

I wish you can understand that small difference. We are not on a manhunt here. We have seen some cases in the past and we are kinda "fed up" with those. So we would like to ensure in the future that no one must face things like this again. (I count both sides to this, that no person will break rules and that no one will be kicked of something like this)

Things are not black and white. Like some people have ensisted things should be viewed independently, according to that idea I see belongs that everyone is responsible of their own actions. That also includes oblication to explain why something was done. Only referring to some "rule" that states there are no rules (has happend to me so many times I have even lost the count). I just cant see how that is improving the commnity and friendlyness in it.

I again say I am humbly sorry for you Alci if you feel offended. I still think both made mistake, one by "breaking" the rules and one by acting bit too rapidly and then referring to such rule. I would divide blame 50/50 if it would be up to me. So no one would feel offended I actually would call this misunderstanding. Yet I do think we are here on something bit bigger than just what happend between WD and Alci and that is the thing we should talk about. Not trying to find who is quilty and to what on this particular case.
 

Alcibiades

Plant Geneticist
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
4,267
Location
Canada
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

Hell BlackWolf, for once i'm inclined to agree with you, to some degree anyways.

I am willing to admit that No-Dachi and yourself didn't really have it out to get me so let's consider that one solved. But WD left a pretty personal attack on me which was, well frankly, uncalled for, insulting and rude. You ask me to consider WD's feelings, well think of mine. I'm an OP who has long been irritated with the inconsistency of Operators and with many of the same complaints you find yourself involved in; and one who tries to be as fair as possible. Then to have this, for lack of a better word, petty complaint thrown into my face is beyond insulting. We are all human, and people make mistakes. Yes he made a mistake asking for IDs, and it's possible I made one by kicking him (although i still stand by my action for kicking; i realize that a more reasoned explanation could have helped the situation). However, the crude personal attacks on me are unnnecessary. WD could have achieved his purpose by doing exactly what Nameless did and posted a thread requesting a change of IRC rules, or a clarification without being so vociferously personal.

He gets mad at me for doing my job, and then complains that other OPs don't do their jobs. Settle on an opinion my friend, either accept that some of us try very hard and occasionally make mistakes; or prefer OPs who do nothing. Personally, I'm vastly more supportive of human operators who can make mistakes than someone who is completely unrepentant and doesn't do anything. No sense in naming names but we all know how it goes....

BlackWolf said:
I pologiese now to you if you felt offended by my posts, I personally think that you followed the rules and you did exactly what rules told you to do. I just dont think that is what I would have done or what I think was the right thing to do.

Apology accepted. That makes me feel good to hear. I was very offended by many of the posts in this thread as I strive very hard to be a good OP and it is very, very insulting to have myself compared to others when (in your opinion) all I did was a little mistake. Let us remember that on both sides of this equation there are humans, human beings who err, make mistakes and are both convinced they are in the right.

I didn't initially understand that you believed I did what was right by the rules and that I followed the rules to the letter. I thought you were annoyed at my behaviour in general. You are, of course, entitled to your opinion and thus you have my apologies for the misunderstanding.

This is the source of frustration for me:

WildDisease said:
This term has been referred to countless times by the IRC operator which either means the ops (more like just Alcibiades) are not properly doing their job

WildDisease said:
all of the ops are rather USELESS and do not do a thing because they are never around. Alci, Bobbin and Markb are about the only ones who actively do their job.

So first I'm not doing my job, and then i'm one of three who does it? Come now sir, make up your mind.

WildDisease said:
(that personally, disgusts me, hence my disrespect shown to fellow operator, Alcin00b)

Those phrases were both beyond unnecessary. Get me to agree to your point, or want me to apologize by insulting me, surely that's the best way to go about it.

As I have posted numerous times, both before and after I became an OP, i feel that the current staff needs a big ole cleansing and that the IRC rules (more recently i agree) need to be reviewed and perhaps altered. As I said in another thread, the problem is with the Operators, not with the rules in general, apart from the shocking lapse of not having one prohibiting solicitation of IDs under any circumstances. Any sort of general thread I probably would have accepted, discussed in, and gone along with with the minimum of fuss. As it stands, personal attacks aren't really very useful, constructive or interesting.

To answer No-Dachi as it relates to warnings: I have never seen a warning have any effect in #bushtarion. I've been on the receiving and the issuing end, and quite frankly it doesn't really accomplish squat. Kicks have far more effect as it forces the player (or 'victim' if you prefer) to think, at least temporarily, about their actions. Especially for older players... people who should know better.

Anyways, if he really feels that hard done by, then he can consider he has my apologies for being overly swift on the kick button. If I apologize to him, I expect an apology in return for the unnecessarily rude, venomous and pointed attacks at an OP who tries, very hard, to be just. Apologies are a two way street....
 

BlackWolf

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,217
Location
Lappeenranta, Finland (Wolf territory)
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

In respond to Alci (as I am not ready to let this whole thing go), I agree with you!
You showd balls to admit here that you acted bit too rapidly. I would expect WD to show some balls too and to pologiese.

I am also happy to see that you have understood what I/some of us was/were after. I think you already have improved the way you are being an OP on #bushtarion. (I am one vouching alci to be op in the future too, I know him well enought to say he has learned of this and will not make same mistake again. This alone gives me enought reason to trust him with such responsibility.) I also agree with Alci on the way how WD responded to Alcis actions, I think WD has went way too far and if it would be up to me he would deserve more than just irc kick.

Yet in the end I think we stil shouldnt forget about this topic. I know it may hurt alcis name, yet I think in the end we should have possibility to discuss about these recent happenings on some place where it is not a change to system, yet I see it more as change to perspective of OPs.

You see I dont think there is wrong about our current OPs, I more think the problem is in the system. I know our OPs and I like everyone of them (well maybe but one ;) ). I just think they have been put to situation where their actions are in a way limited, and they have caused certain expectations above themselves with past actions. This all has lead us to a system where from stupidity and joking you can be punished more than from intentional ruining of others enjoyment of play. By this I mean more the way this "rule" thing works, as restriction of OPs instead of being the restricting of players.

Actually players dont even read these rules than after being warned or kicked. Same way old OPs have put limitations so high on certain actions that it is very cruel to follow those. I personally see that IRC should be adapted to be part of ingame system and if you deserve a ban in IRC it would include game too. (not nesessary by ops, yet reported to Azzer etc.). This would lead to system where behaving and giving bans would be thought by all sides bit more closely and behaving would be more a actual benefit than just the situation where you are less bored.
 

Lukey

Harvester
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
143
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

Funny how its always Alci involved, imo alci for deop! one of the reason i dont like going in to #bushtarion is coz of power abusing ops.
 

Twigley

Hydroponics Developer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
2,694
Location
UK
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

Your having problems with a few ops aswell?

Yeah i kinda stopped using IRC now as 2 ops are abusing their power.
 

Martin

Garden Designer
Super Moderator
Community Operator
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
970
Location
England
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

I find the Ops fine, I just don't go in #bushtarion as some people get on my nerves :p
 

tobapopalos

Hydroponics Developer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
2,759
Location
Manchester
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

Martin said:
I find the Ops fine, I just don't go in #bushtarion as some people get on my nerves :p

Ditto. I've never had a problem with power-mad ops. Maybe they're confusing "power-mad" ops with competent ops, as we've been living with incompetent ones for so long that they've forgotten what competence looks like.

Don't break the rules and you won't get punished. Simple as.
 

ToY

Weeder
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
15
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

The short amount of time I spend in #Bushtarion I have not seen a "powerhungry" op. Has all been fine IMO. But meh, maby they wait until I am gone.
 

Alcibiades

Plant Geneticist
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
4,267
Location
Canada
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

ToY said:
The short amount of time I spend in #Bushtarion I have not seen a "powerhungry" op. Has all been fine IMO. But meh, maby they wait until I am gone.

We're plotting against you :evil:

/joke
 

BlackWolf

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,217
Location
Lappeenranta, Finland (Wolf territory)
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

[10:56pm] <Hobbezak> Terrakan I'll send you 500t worth of hippies if you give me your id.

No kick...
Still waiting.
In exchange got attacked by some people saying how it is havoc of miniround... To me if IRC rules say it is illegal then it must be illegal to everyone not dependable of the time... IRC rules say no IDs and stuff so why is this guy different?
 

tobapopalos

Hydroponics Developer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
2,759
Location
Manchester
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

It's always been accepted that you can post IDs in the last 24 hours of the round and during havoc. So, given that this was during a fun mini-round, and also in havoc of said mini-round, there's is absolutely no reason to kick him.

Stop ****-stirring ffs.
 

BlackWolf

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,217
Location
Lappeenranta, Finland (Wolf territory)
Re: @Azzer - IRC Op abuse of power

I have not seen rules saying that asking of IDs or posting IDs at havoc is allowed.

Rules are rules, if rules are obeyed at joke case they must be followed at havoc case. If not whole arguement of Alci is just a joke.
 
Top