tobapopalos
Hydroponics Developer
People who fire from guns and brag about it cant fire from their penis a wise man once said.
Was it me?
People who fire from guns and brag about it cant fire from their penis a wise man once said.
The Ak-74U is the submachine gun which is the one without the stock. The AK47 is the assault rifle. There is no AKSU.
l2guns
I affectionately nickname it the AKSU (actual technical name for this variant is the Kalashnikov AKS-74U). You will notice however, that I made reference to it being an AK74 without a stock. The 'AKSU' was made as a specialized CQB stockless/folding stock assault rifle for Spetsnaz Russian Special Forces during the Cold War era.
So yes, it is an assault rifle, as it still used the 5.45x39mm Warsaw Pact round. Submachine guns more often than not utilise small arms caliber, and combine it with rapid fire at the cost of some stopping power. They were made for CQB situations where over-penetration of targets was undesired (such as hostage situations).
So in short, no. It is an assault rifle that was incorrectly categorized. The AK47 and the AK74 are totally different weaponry eras - The AK74 replaced the AK47 as the assault rifle of the Warsaw Pact in 1970.
But seriously, if you want me to actually educate you about weapons, I've also fired an AK47 and an AK74-M (amongst many others), so I can also tell you all about how different in appearance and practicality they actually are. Your knowledge is based on games and the internet. Mine is based upon experience. You can go and baw about putting your foot in your mouth, now.
The Ak-74U is the submachine gun which is the one without the stock. The AK47 is the assault rifle. There is no AKSU.
l2guns
I affectionately nickname it the AKSU (actual technical name for this variant is the Kalashnikov AKS-74U). You will notice however, that I made reference to it being an AK74 without a stock. The 'AKSU' was made as a specialized CQB stockless/folding stock assault rifle for Spetsnaz Russian Special Forces during the Cold War era.
So yes, it is an assault rifle, as it still used the 5.45x39mm Warsaw Pact round. Submachine guns more often than not utilise small arms caliber, and combine it with rapid fire at the cost of some stopping power. They were made for CQB situations where over-penetration of targets was undesired (such as hostage situations).
So in short, no. It is an assault rifle that was incorrectly categorized. The AK47 and the AK74 are totally different weaponry eras - The AK74 replaced the AK47 as the assault rifle of the Warsaw Pact in 1970.
But seriously, if you want me to actually educate you about weapons, I've also fired an AK47 and an AK74-M (amongst many others), so I can also tell you all about how different in appearance and practicality they actually are. Your knowledge is based on games and the internet. Mine is based upon experience. You can go and baw about putting your foot in your mouth, now.
Yeah, we're talking about a game, and for the purposes of the game it made more sense to put it in the submachine gun category. Who cares what kind of ammunition it uses? If you're looking for 100% accuracy perhaps you shouldn't play computer games.
And the single player was rubbish, like you said.
Personally one of the things that has kept me playing black ops all this time is the wager matches, really hope something similar is in MW3 as they are a ton of fun and mixes things up rather than constantly playing your standard TDM or w/e...
Also the ability to have 2 players on the same console keeps me and my friends playing most days so they better not drop that!!!!!
The Ak-74U is the submachine gun which is the one without the stock. The AK47 is the assault rifle. There is no AKSU.
l2guns
Black Ops isn't a bad game. Compared to other FPS games I've played it is still better, but all CoD games are ultimately going to be immediately compared with CoD4, and they won't ever come out on top.
All the CoD games since 4 have essentially been the same with slightly changed perks/guns/maps. Unfortunately they've all tried too hard to make it as customisable as possible, rather than trying to improve gameplay. So many of the options on BO are completely unnecessary. Face camo anyone? While also getting rid of some of the cool unlockables from CoD4 / MW2. Now you can buy them all and it doesn't mean you've achieved diddly squat. Buying any perks whenever you want, buying the gun camos whenever, buying attachments whenever...that was a step backwards imo.
Also, how many pages of statistics do you need? :/
And the single player was rubbish, like you said.
you should earn gun unlocks etc. not just buy them.