Bounty

[Alcibiades]

The whole problem is that attackers get insurance.

The way I see it - attackers get bounty, defenders get insurance.

There should be no way to have both.

Attackers get both insurance and bounty tho?

I think f0xx meant that that's the way it should be, not the way it is; and upon further reflection i'm inclined to agree with him. If you make the percentages of gains profitable enough, and simply reduce to bounty on the one hand, and insurance on the other than at a stroke you've eliminated the problem inherent in this thread, and have a system that makes 'logical' sense (not to mention a simpler system).

 

[lavadog]

oh my bad, I misread fox's post. I tend to agree with that too, however if you think about it, the currents system encourages offensive and adventurous play to a certain extent

 

[f0xx]

however if you think about it, the currents system encourages offensive and adventurous play to a certain extent

Bashing much smaller targets too.

 

[lavadog]

yep, that's why I said

You could make it percentage wise too tho, so that people with high scores can't just bash people in little alliances because they would get close to no bounty that way.

Change little alliance to smaller score and bing, you got a possible solution It can be profitable to bash smaller targets now, so that might need some tweaking

 

[timtadams]

The whole problem is that attackers get insurance.

The way I see it - attackers get bounty, defenders get insurance.

There should be no way to have both.

Agreed here too. Doesnt really make sense... does it?

 

[Silence]

The whole problem is that attackers get insurance.

The way I see it - attackers get bounty, defenders get insurance.

There should be no way to have both.

Agreed here too. Doesnt really make sense... does it?

Well of course it makes sense. As mentioned earlier by atleast two people. It would suggest that the game is more about being offensive and encourages attacking.

Might I also remind you that bounty is lessened if you at targetting players at 30%-40%, which the players in question at the beginning of the thread surely were. So whilst attackers get bounty & insurance more often than not that bounty is rather redundant

 

[timtadams]

Well i guess so