well the guy being accussed of troops trading to make gants, all the evidence is circumstantial and dosnt prove anything for certain. You dont know it could be he attacking stupid newbs. The locked guys musta had something more substantial than that.
Mostly I think mods/helpers should be given the power to lock/punish people if theres more than one agreeing on the evidence for cheating.
Mostly I think mods/helpers should be given the power to lock/punish people if theres more than one agreeing on the evidence for cheating.
This would require all the mods/helpers to stop playing otherwise there will always be the issue of impartiality
Mostly I think mods/helpers should be given the power to lock/punish people if theres more than one agreeing on the evidence for cheating.
This would require all the mods/helpers to stop playing otherwise there will always be the issue of impartiality
why I said you would need multiple people agreeing on the cheat, abuse that and they risk losing their status as helpers. The other option is the current situation of cheating idiots running amok.
Agreed...since Oggie could be easily bribed with a hamburger and strawberry milkshake
iirc when i tried to proxy through the internet ban on "games" on a works laptop i couldnt sign in something to do with storing cookies. i assumed therefore its no longer possible?Also proxy access to the game should be stopped with this being a lockable offense. Wont stop all cheating but would certainly slow multis down.
Pick me plz :mrgreen:This gives me an idea for a themed alliance. 4 members, 5 IDs each - anyone interested?
I would worry, the game would be ruined if everybody did this - well for the players who play fairly would lose the will to play at all.I dont worry too much about people copying the cheater. To me its like spies in an alliance. (except worse in the sense its decidedly wrong so says azzer). if you have to cheat or spie to beat some one you arent any good will never learn and are worse than the person you are trying to beat, no matter how nice it is to beat them
It is kinda cool how many he has though (not that I can see them or anything).and if you only care about 'oo look how many gargantuas i have woooow'. then your a bit pathetic, someone who I pitty firstly for being ****, and secondly for caring so much about something so trivial. and you cannot ever cheat well enough to win, or win anything of merit. but it still should be punished
That would be incredibly silly, that would mean somebody could keep track of your ID and find you every round, regardless of whether you are public or not? Or do you just mean for cheaters?my suggestion to azzer would be force everyone to have a public profile number. that can not be hidden or cannot be changed and make thier profile namess public after 2 weeks so the potential cheats are shown for who they are. they cant hide behind amonimity and lies and revenge can be sought.
Vote for me :rofl:also any non azzer admin should only have abilities to kill/land farm with admin units. and not anything else. (even be able to do that if the target is in sleep mode)
bribenoobia is still in the top 10 allies, hope the lower part of the playerbase know their stuff and make sure the cheating ally is gone from the portal spot by rounds end...